I'm seeking an attorney to work on contingency and file 23 lawsuits/class action lawsuits. However, litigation is extremely expensive, so it is difficult to find such an attorney. Therefore I am offering a $23,000,000 reward or 23% of whatever settlements I receive (whichever is less) to any attorney or individual who alerts the right attorney to my plight - if this attorney takes these cases on contingency and wins. The attorney has to be a "litigation attorney" that specializes in constitutional rights or civil rights. This is what I was told by an attorney that gave me free online legal advice without knowing my full story. I personally believe that attorneys that specialize in class action litigation or regularly handle cases involving litigation against the government may also be able to take on these cases.
Below is my story and the resultant lawsuits and class actions suits I wish to file (23 total) against several government agencies. I think I can get at least $100-500 Million for everything! If this is correct, I could easily pay the $23,000,000 referral fee.
Attorneys: If you don't want to take all 23 cases because of the potential expense, please consider just picking the few you think are most likely to succeed & pay the biggest. Then I can pay you or another attorney upfront to peruse the remaining litigation issues with funds from any financial compensation received.
It all started when I was accused of making over $1,000,000 with fraud after being arrested in 2012 by the US Postal Inspection Service in California. Having schizophrenia, I was transferred to a government prison-hospital in Missouri and found incompetent to stand trial in 2014.
The above is the foundation that allowed the US Government to pull the three Super Scams on me listed below. The last of which involved the cooperation and an additional scam perpetrated by Emergence Addiction and Mental Health Services in Eugene Oregon, USA.
Super Scam I
I Was Falsely Labeled Dangerous (As Almost All Mentally Ill Inmates Are) For The Financial Gain Of The US Government
After I was found incompetent to stand trial, instead of releasing me immediately like they should have, they used one little insignificant incident of violence on my record to proclaim me to be too "dangerous" to be released into society and committed me to the institution for life. But they purportedly do this to everyone who has any small incident of violence on their criminal record as I deduced from statements from the prison staff and the defense employed doctor that evaluated me to see if I was really dangerous as the prison doctors had claimed. This is obviously a scheme to keep them in business. If they let too many people go clean instead of proclaiming them to be "Dangerous" and putting them on conditional release (probation) as I am now, not too many people would violate probation and have to reenter the prison hospital. A lot of prison staff would have to be laid-off and so would judges and doctors who do institution related work. The defense doctor who evaluated me well knew I was not dangerous at all and told me he would recommend to the judge that I am released. Then he stabbed in the back by telling the judge he feels I should be committed to the institution for life. This proves they are ALL in cahoots in this scam. He probably has to do this often as it is a difficult task to look an intelligent being in the eye and tell him you're recommending his commitment to the institution for life when you both know it is totally unnecessary. If this is the case, evidence can be gathered by talking to others of above average to high IQ whom he "evaluated." (He's probably told many such people he'd recommend their release and then betrayed them by supporting their commitment).
Further proof that this is a scam is that shortly after I was found to be extremely "Dangerous," I was allowed to leave on "Conditional Release" - which is probation for life. They obviously did not believe I was dangerous or they would not have found me "not dangerous if taking medications" only months later. They just wanted me to be put on probation hoping I violate one day on any day of the rest of my life so I could come back to the institution and keep their worthless hides employed. The defense psychiatrist told me that they almost never let anyone go unless it is on "Conditional Release." What a scam!
Super Scam II
Attempted Constitutional Rights Violation For The Financial Gain Of US Government And [***Censored***]
I am on probation for false allegations of being "Dangerous." I am not on probation for the alleged fraud of which I was accused. But the US Postal Inspector does not understand this, or he is a racist who is used to getting away with the persecution of blacks. The US Constitution clearly states "Innocent Until Proven Guilty." The US Constitution does not say "Innocent Until Proven Guilty Unless Black and/or Cannot Afford A Good Attorney." But this is the way the US Postal Inspection Service and US Attorney's Office are used to interpreting the Constitution because, according to my probation officer of the US Probation Department in Oregon, the Postal Inspector and US Attorney's Office in California collaborated and sent him a bunch of papers containing all the alleged evidenced from my CLOSED case as if I had been convicted. This probation officer also told me they were drawing up a court order to submit to a judge to have it mandated that any business plans I had must be run by him first. I think this is a half-truth because it was my probation officer whom I told that while I was sitting up in prison for four years, my hobby was making business plans and I had figured out many ways to make millions and more through okay methods. How did the US Attorney's Office and Postal Inspection Service know I was planning to launch new businesses unless after they sent him these papers, he said, "By the way, he's planning to start a business, maybe you should write up a court order so I can monitor his activities." In the meantime, while the alleged papers were being prepared for court submission, he told me I must run all my business plans by him for approval. This made me angry, so I spent $95 on an attorney, and as I knew he would, the attorney told me, "No new court order, no new conditions on probation." The testimony of this attorney can serve as evidence that he did harass me with new conditions on my probation without authorization if he should deny he made such a demand of me at any future time. I'd just been released, and I had no income, so I barely had any money at the time. Why would I waste $95 on a verifiable attorney fee and related verifiable questions the attorney can affirm if he did not really piss me off by making that unauthorized demand?
Next, having schizophrenia, I got approved for Social Security, and I got a lump sum for a few thousand dollars in February of 2017. So I emailed the postal inspector and asked him if I could hire an attorney or errand running company to get my property for me in California and mail it to me in Oregon (so I would not have to make the expensive trip). The postal inspector asked me why was using an email account out of Latvia (*?*@inbox.lv) and other questions that were none of his business and I suspected he was conducting an unauthorized police investigation after case closure and I wanted to tell him where he could go roast for all eternity. But I figured if I was nice (plus I had nothing to hide) he might be nice in return and allow me to reclaim my property by my requested, potentially unconventional means. Thus I told him because of "Edward Snowden."
In our next meeting, my probation officer told me that this inspector was having yet another court order drawn up to present to a judge for approval that would mandate that all my Internet and possibly computer activities be monitored. Just because of my use of non-American email (that would be much less likely to illegally give him a copy of all my emails without a court order and because I was using an anonymous proxy as I always do post Snowden's relations). This made me so angry I rushed home a registered about nine anti-government corruption websites.
Just before I was provoked to register all those websites, the postal inspector had asked me for my mailing address after I threatened to report his not responding to my inquiries as to if I could hire a third party to claim my property or not. He did not say he had any intention of returning my belongings so I thought Thompson possibly just wanted my address so he could ascertain my ISP. I was going to ask an attorney if I could have my property shipped to his address, so I had not written the postal inspector back with my mailing address. Then after I got news of his unconstitutional and possibly illegal plans to monitor all my computer activities because I believed Snowden and took measures to increase Internet privacy (as did 90% of Americans, I read) I wrote him from an email address @ one of my anti-government corruptions domains names and gave my business mailing address for that domain name as my mailing address to indirectly say, "If you want to watch, I'll give you something to watch alright!" (I knew he would visit my websites).
I don't advocate violence on any of my websites. I state that the current corrections system is slavery, primarily for minorities and is designed to fail to reform anybody as they need masses of people on probation, parole and behind bars going in and out of the system's revolving doors for life - to stay in business. They have a conflict of interest about actually reforming people as if they did they have to downsize by, I estimate, approximately 80%. Then I list effectual corrections technology that government knows about and is purposely not using, and one of my many effective rehabilitation ideas to give interested parties a sample of what I can do. Then I solicit donations to build an alternative law enforcement organization that will cure people and not keep them sick to make money.
Super Scam III
Psychological Abuse, Sexual And Racial Discrimination By Emergence Addiction and Mental Health Services In Eugene Oregon After Defamation By US Probation Officer
My standing up for my rights did not sit well with my probation officer. Because I had the intelligence to become angry when some authority tried to violate my constitutional rights and was not in a Pollyanna mood when he would keep harassing me about the plans of the US Postal Inspector and US Attorney's Office in California, he demanded I increase my court-mandated counseling from a tolerable once a month to an annoying four times a month. He asked me would I comply. I told him I would comply, but I'd put up a website explaining the findings of psychologist Colin Ross that psychiatry is a scam where the patient is deliberately made worse so they will have to either keep seeing the psychologist for life or if they do manage to exit counseling, they still keep the psychiatric industry rich by the buying expensive pills prescribed by psychiatrists for life. And I'd collect statistics to verify the finding of Dr. Colin Ross that psychiatric medications only perform a tiny percentage better than placebos and more often than not have so many terrible side effects it is better not to take them in most cases. This is especially true in the long run since many of the medications do permanent long-term damage to the "patient." Then I'd sue the doctors and the government for making me go. He immediately retracted his statement and lied to my face. He told me he had only said he'd suggest to my psychologist that he feels that I need more counseling (based on my religious views and plans to fight law enforcement corruption and being brave enough to stand up for my rights) and the decision would ultimately be hers.
I thought this ***** was my friend and would see my side. She did not believe I was dangerous when we first met and I told her that label was BS. She also did not think I had much need of counseling so she would interrogate me about my religious views every session. At first, I thought she was a fellow truth seeker and perhaps even a soulmate as I also study religion (as well as science) in my spare time - so at first, I did not mind talking to her about religion. But then she started to make me very angry by contradicting every answer I gave to her malpractice-religious-questions. This is what eventually prompted me to look up on Google "Is psychology a scam" and find Dr. Colin Ross's video and books and many supporting YouTube videos by other people as well. I did not say anything to her, and I was trying to give her the benefit of the doubt and secretly evaluating her to see if she was seeking to employ MK-Ultra mind control to attempt to destroy my self-esteem so one day I'd just believe anything she told me without thinking for myself. But when she agreed with my probation officer that I have no right to have any emotional reaction to government violation of my constitutional rights, and I should suppress my emotions and do nothing, I realized she was trying to give me a psychological castration. I also realized that she was an utterly worthless financial parasite ***** who would never let me leave counseling because that would mean less money for her. So I put up a website to destroy the psychiatric industry by replacing it with an alternative industry that is not hostile as I did regarding the issue of corrupt law enforcement. I also refused to go to her anymore and told my probation officer I'm exercising my right to seek help elsewhere because of her malpractice of imposing her New Age religious beliefs on people as a substitute for psychiatry. She once disclosed to me the establishment wound frown on her if they ever found out about her unconventional techniques (she does this regularly to her clients). Well, they are going to find out now. (Update 7/23/2017: Some time ago I filed my complaint against her with the Board of Psychiatry).
To summarize, Scam III is the subjugation of myself to extra unnecessary psychiatric "care" because of my righteous indignation against government corruption and my willingness to take a stand. And the attempt of the psychiatric department in a joint effort with my probation officer (The US Government) to censor the religious beliefs expressed on my websites and emasculate me (psychologically castrate me) because I dare to have righteous indignation and use those emotions to fuel creativity to find unconventional solutions. None of which are illegal. It is also psychological abuse for trying to get me to suppress negative feeling (righteous indignation) as if I were the villain, and not the US Government, who was repeatedly trying to violate my constitutional and civil rights. And it also includes the independent psychological abuse of my counselor, C.W. at Emergence Addiction and Mental Health Services in Eugene, Oregon. She continually agitated me and kept me in a state of irritability by contradicting everything I'd say in response to her malpractice-religious-interrogations, possibly in an attempt to destroy my self-esteem with the employment of MK-Ultra tactics or something similar. In fact, if it were not for this heightened state of emotional irritability this C.W. had me in regularly, I would have just called the ACLU like I usually did when the government screwed with me and of course, they would have done nothing.
I am studying MK-Ultra mind control tactics to see if this is what Emergency Addiction and Mental Health Services was attempting to use on me and one thing I've learned so far is if you want complete control of a person, you have first to destroy their identity. Next, you replace it with the persona you wish. This is why slave owner would give their slaves new names shortly after purchase. Destroying the self-confidence is a part of identity destruction. This ***** was trying to enslave me!
I'm looking for lawyers to help me file lawsuits and class actions lawsuits for all the Super Scams above.
For Scam III: Psychological Abuse, Sexual and Racial Discrimination By Emergence In Eugene Oregon & Defamation By US Probation Department, I wish to sue for anything and everything below that is feasible.
For Scam II: Attempted Constitutional Rights Violation For The Financial Gain Of The US Government And [***Censored***]
For Scam I: The False Labeling Of Myself And Anyone With Even One Insignificant Incidence Of Violence On Record As Dangerous For The Financial Gain Of The US Government, I wish to sue for anything and everything feasible below.
Possible hate crime enhancement can be applied to several of the above.
I am a highly organized Virgo, and a can neatly put together all evidence (that does not require an investigator) supporting every claim I've made on this website on request. I also have all names, but I have omitted them to temporarily protect the accused.
One Additional Big Lawsuit Possibility Added Today
In a felony attempt to shut me up for the potentially subversive websites they are afraid of, it seems the US Postal Inspection Service and/or Assistant US Attorney have reopened my old case or opened a new one. I learned of this after filing a Freedom of Information request with the US Postal Inspection Service. I was told they could not give me information about an open case. The postal inspector and/or AUSA were probably hoping they'd get me arrested for something unrelated to my websites so I could stop raising funds to sue them and reform law enforcement in some ways. It is a felony civil rights violation to abuse law enforcement powers to try to thwart a citizen's freedom of speech. This is enhanced in this case as it is racially motivated as well. One more lawsuit here and this one should be the easiest to prove and prosecute in court. Evidence: I have IP logs of the Postal Inspection Service, probably mainly the postal inspector whom I was dealing with, paying unnecessary visits to my anti-law enforcement corruption websites long after he learned about them. These logs can disprove any future denials he may make that his personal feeling about the sites and fear that I'd raise the money required to press charges played any part in his felony abuse of authority in opening/reopening the case.
Yet More Big Lawsuit Possibilities Added Today
In perhaps an additional felony attempt to shut me up for the potentially subversive websites they are afraid of, it seems that my US mail is being intercepted. I sent a registered mail piece containing a couple of hundreds of circulars that were supposed to be delivered by a particular type of discount mail after reception by the postmaster in Redondo Beach, California. The package was supposed to arrive at its destination on 7/31/2017. For a long time the package tracking status was showing: "Delayed." Another of my registered mail pieces seemed to have disappeared too so I became very suspicious and filed a mail fraud complaint with the Office Of The Inspector General and I also complained to the FBI online on August 7th 2017. On August 15th 2017 I called the postmaster of Redondo Beach at zip code 90277 and inquired about the status of the refund for the non provided special mailing service I paid for online. She put me on hold to check on things. Then she called and left me a voicemail telling me that the package had actually arrived and she would update the status of the package as "Delivered." She did this and now my tracking number shows that the package was (allegedly) delivered on 7/31/2017 when up until 8/15/2017 it showed package status as "Delayed" ("Intercepted" would be the right word, I think). I believe she is lying as shortly after the date my package was supposed to arrive, my website IP logs show that an IP address (126.96.36.199) only a few blocks from the White House visited one of the websites I was trying to conduct an advertising test on that was on the circulars in the package I mailed to the postmaster for delivery to Redondo Beach residents. I remembered this IP address as it visited one or more of my old potentially subversive websites (the literature I was advertising in the package sent to Redondo Beach was for business websites not connected to potentially subversive sites). So it looks like Washington possibly has me on a watch list as a potential national security threat when my old websites, most of which I was going to abandon, do not advocate violence or make any kind of terrorists threats. So there are two lawsuit possibilities here:
More Evidence Supporting Above Lawsuit Possibility Added Today
I tried to relaunch my business with the post office's discount mail service. My mail was intercepted again, but this time they did something even more stupid: They tried to trick me like they mailed the circulars by making my websites show traffic somehow. (Or so it seems). However, all of the traffic should have come from the state of Oregon, but I only got one visitors from my home state when they all should have come from here as the pages are new and I did not submit them to search engines or anything else. Their trying to deceive me is evidence they know there is no legitimate reason for a case to be open against me or for me to be on a watch list. For complete details, including IP log evidence and info about the 5-10% effective backdoor they seem to have in my computer, Click Here.
BIG MONEY TO BE MADE IN LAWSUITS/CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS FOR THE SUPER SCAMS AND CRIMINAL OFFENSES LISTED ABOVE!
Again, attorneys (or individuals) please contact me or refer me to another attorney for a $23,000,000.00 referral fee. Or 23% (whichever is less) of my portion of settlement after I pay attorney his/her percentage - if this lawyer takes my case on contingency and wins. (If it is legal to offer this referral fee. I quite sure it is).
Legal Disclaimer: I am such an old soul I have a reputation for being right about almost everything around 95% of the time. Usually, even when everyone else vehemently disagrees with me, I am eventually proven correct. However, I am not an attorney. Although the US Constitutions clearly says "Innocent Until Proven Guilty," and even though if there was legal power to place terms on my probation that would have likely been if I had been convicted of the allegations the judge would have imposed them, without a law degree, I don't feel I can be 100% certain that there is no loophole in the law that allows a postal inspector to investigate me and/or try to impose new conditions on my probation for a crime I was not convicted of and for a case that is closed on top of that. Just because it is done all the time does not mean it is not unconstitutional or illegal. Is not the government notorious for violating laws? If the postal inspector had legitimate legal grounds for his genocidal activities of trying to give me more opportunities to violate my probation by imposing more and more conditions on my probation so I could go back to the prison-hospital, thus decreasing the likelihood that I would father a black child, then he has my sincere apologies. Furthermore, perhaps my probation officer was not being honest with me about not being the one who suggested the first or second set of proposed new conditions on my probation. Perhaps he is behind the whole thing. Also, other statements on this website may be speculative.
Backup websites: [***Censored***]